User Experience on E-Government Online Services: A Case Study on The SIMPATIKA Service Application at The Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia

Authors

  • Bondan Sapta Prakoso Departemen Sistem Informasi ITS
  • Apol Pribadi Subriadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.20183152

Abstract

User Experience (UX) is increasingly popular as a success factor in a product, system or service in many sectors and industries, including government institutions. User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is one of the tools at measure UX. The purpose of this study is to measure UX on the SIIMPATIKA Service Application as one type of E-Government Online Services in the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia. There are 127 employees of Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs participating in this research as respondent. The results of this study found that the SIMPATIKA Service  obtained a very positive UX score on attributes of attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, and stimulation.   However, novelty has a score quite positive than other attributes .   The results of this study can be provides additional ideas for further development of the  application of SIMPATIKA  service at the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs.

References

Cota, M.P., Thomaschewski, J., Schrepp, M., and Gonçalves, R. Efficient measurement of the user experience. A Portuguese version. Procedia Computer Science 27: 491-498 (2014).

Hassenzahl, M. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13.4: 481-499 (2001).

Kirakowski, J. What is SUMI? [Online]. Available at http://sumi.uxp.ie/about/whatis.html, 2014. [Accessed: June 15, 2018].

Lallemand, C., Gronier, G. and Koenig, V. User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey. Computers in Human Behavior 43: 35-48 (2015).

Laugwitz, B.; Schrepp, M. & Held, T.: Konstruktion eines Fragebogens zur Messung der User Experience von Softwareprodukten. In: A.M. Heinecke & H. Paul (eds.): Mensch & Computer 2006 – Mensch und Computer im Strukturwandel, pp. 125–134. Oldenbourg Verlag, (2006).

Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2008).

Nam, T. Determining the type of E-Government use, Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006 (2014).

QUIS. About the QUIS. [Online]. Available at http://lap.umd.edu/quis/, 2017. [Accessed: June 15, 2018]

Rauschenberger, M., Hinderks, A., and Thomaschewski, J. BenutzererlebnisbeiUnternehmenssoftware. Usability Professionals: 158-164 (2011).

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., and Preece, J. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. (2011).

Santoso, H.B., Isal, R.Y.K., Basaruddin, T., Sadira, L., and Schrepp, M. Research-in-progress: User experience evaluation of Student Centered E-Learning Environment for computer science program. User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2014 3rd International Conference on. IEEE (2014).

Schrepp, M., Olschner, S., & Schubert, U. User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) Benchmark: UEQ-Evaluations in the area of business software. Usability Professionals 2013 (pp. 348-354). Stuttgart, Germany: German UPA eV (2013).

Sauro, J. Measuring the Quality of the Website User Experience. Diss. UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (2016).

SIMPATIKA. About SIMPATIKA. [On line]. Available at http://simpatika.kemenag.go.id/ [ Accessed: June 30, 2018]

SUPRQ. The Standardized User Experience Percentile Rank Questionnaire. [Online]. Available at http://www.suprq.com/, 2017. [Accessed: June 15, 2018]

Thayer, A., and Dugan, T.E. Achieving design enlightenment: Defining a new user experience measurement framework. Professional Communication Conference, 2009.

IPCC 2009. IEEE International. IEEE (2009).

UEQ-Online. User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). [Online]. Available: http://www.ueq-online.org/, 2017. [Accessed: June 28, 2018]

Vermeeren, A.P., Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. "User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs." Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM (2010).

Wang, Y.S., Liao, Y.W. Assessing E-Government systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Gov. Inf. Q.25, 717 – 733 (2008)

Yusrida Muflihah, Tony Dwi Susanto. Factors affecting citizens and governments in e-government adoption: a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (JTIIK). Vol. 4, December 4, p. 304-310 (2017).

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01

How to Cite

Prakoso, B. S., & Subriadi, A. P. (2018). User Experience on E-Government Online Services: A Case Study on The SIMPATIKA Service Application at The Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 3(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.20183152

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1: June 2018

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 International (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).