Main Article Content


Disaster management is important to reduce the risk casualties as well as the environment and economic impacts. One of the stakeholders in disaster management in Indonesia at the local level is the Regional Disaster Management Agency (Badan Pengelolaan Bencana Daerah – BPBD).  In the process of disaster management, there are several phases. Thi initial phase is known as the prevention phase, which is an attempt to eliminate or reduce the possibility of a threat. In this phase, the role of information technology is important to increase the efficiency in disaster management. One of the information technologies that is used widely in disaster management is the Geographic Information System (GIS). This study explores the role of GIS technology employed at BPBD of Batu City in disaster management. The Research Qualitative Data Analysis (RQDA) method is employed based on the questionnaire data. The results show that the role of GIS technology is very limited. The disaster management at the Batu City is mostly done by the traditional method with the manual approach. The role of technology is limited it needs to be improved. Suggestions for increasing the role of technology is to conduct training on the use of GIS for employees. It is expected to increase the role of technology in disaster management.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kriswibowo, R., Ramdani, F., & Aknuranda, I. (2021). Exploring the role of geospatial technology in disaster management of Batu City: Qualitative analysis using RQDA method. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 6(1), 80–95.


  1. . Aronoff, Geographic Information Sistem : A Management Perpective, Ottawa, Canada: WDL Publication, 1989.
  2. . D. Mileti, Disasters by design, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry, 1999.
  3. . U. S. Agency, "National Mitigation Strategy: Partnerships for Building Safer Communities.," FEMA, Washington D.C, 1995.
  4. . Thomas D.S et all., The Role of Geographic Information Systems/Remote Sensing in Disaster Management. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research.,, New York, NY: Springer,, 2007.
  5. . Esri, "Geographic Information System (GIS) Framework for Disaster Management," pp. 1-16, 2008.
  6. . Ali Mansourian et all, "Development of a Web-Based GIS Using SDI for Disaster Management," Geo-information for Disaster Management, no., pp. pp 599-608, 2005.
  7. . Hamid Assilzadeh et all, "Landslide Catastrophes and Disaster Risk Reduction: A GISFramework for Landslide Prevention and Management," Remote Sensing, vol. 2, no. doi:10.3390/rs2092259 , pp. 2259-2273, 2010.
  8. . Camila Rodrigues Dias et all, "Qualitative review of usability problems in health information systems for radiology," Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. Volume 76, no., pp. 19-33, 2017.
  9. . Walji et all, "Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR," International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. Volume 83, no. Issue 5,, pp. 361-367, 2015.
  10. . G. R. Gibbs, "Learning and qualitative data analysis with information technology: the role of exploration," no., 2017.
  11. . P. Prevos, "The Invisible Water Utility. Employee Behaviour and Customer Experience in Service-Dominant Logic.," no. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.2979902. , Peter.
  12. . BPBD Kota Batu, "Jelang Penghujan, BPBD Kota Batu Waspadai Longsor," Indonesia, 2020.
  13. . W. Deby, "Peran Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (Bpbd) Dalam Tahap Kesiapsiagaan (Studi Pada Kantor BPBD Kota Batu)," Respon Publik, Vols. 13, No 3, pp. 34-41, 2019.
  14. . Sevilla, Research methods, Quezon City: Rex Printing Company, 2007.
  15. . G. Norman, "“Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws†of statisticsâ€," Advances in Health Science Education, vol. vol 15(5), pp. 625-632, 2010.
  16. . l. S. Yanto Chandra, "An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research," Qualitative Market Research, vol. 20, no. doi:10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014, p. 90–112, 2017.
  17. . U. Kelle, Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice, Sage Publications, 1995.
  18. . T. G. Nick, "Descriptive Statistics," Topics in Biostatistics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 404, no. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_3, p. pp. 33–52, 2007.
  19. . Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D., Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2018.
  20. . S. Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan., Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2006.
  21. . U. Kuckartz, Qualitative Text Analysis., Sage Publications, 2014.
  22. . M. E. J. N. a. M. Girvan, "Finding and evaluating community structure in networks," vol. 69, no., 2004.
  23. . D. S. P. B. M Vanwindekens, "Development of a broadened cognitive mapping approach for analysing systems of practices in social–ecological systems, Ecological Modelling,," vol. Volume 250, no., p. 352–362, 2013.
  24. . Lewins, Using Software in Qualitative Research : A Step-by-Step Guide., Sage Publication, 2007.
  25. . C. S. &. B. J. Burns, "Communication overload: A phenomenological inquiry into academic reference librarianship.," Journal of Documentation, vol. 68(5), no., pp. 596-617, 2012.