Main Article Content


Landslides is the top rank disaster in the number of incidents in Batu City. Currently, the handling of landslides in Batu City still lack preparation in preparedness phase. In preparedness phase, as an early step before a landslide take place, need a systematic disaster management. The disaster management refers to the use of a framework as a guideline to understand disasters that will occur. Batu City have developed a framework as a guideline for landslide management, but the quality and maturity are questionable. Therefore, this study proposes an evaluation of conceptual framework for landslides natural disaster management. The specific objective is to know the quality of proposed framework, find the weakness and strength. Evaluation is held by using featured based analysis which using seven criteria i.e. background, goal, model, content, legitimation, implementation and contribution. The result shows that the framework  is feasible to use as a guideline to manage the landslide management in preparedness phase in Batu City.

Article Details

Author Biography

Puad Siswahyudi, Brawijaya University

Magister Computer Science
How to Cite
Siswahyudi, P., Ramdani, F., & Bachtiar, F. A. (2019). Evaluating Conceptual Framework for Landslides Natural Disaster Management using Feature Analysis. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 4(3), 241–252.


  1. UNISDR.: Words into Action Guidelines: National Disaster Risk Assessment. Hazard Specific Risk Assessment. 3 Landslide Hazard and Risk Assessment. 2017.
  2. Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah.: Press Release Bencana Kota Batu Tahun 2018.
  3. NEC.: Disaster Management System. NEC Corporation. (2006)
  4. Abdalla, R., Esmail, M.: WebGIS for Disaster Management and Emergency Response. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development. 2019.
  5. Nazir, M.K., Bajwa, I.S., Khan, M.I.: A Conceptual Framework for Earthquake Disaster Management System (EDMS) for Quetta City using GIS. International Conference on Advances in Space. ISBN: 1-4244-0514-9. 2006. DOI: 10.1109/ICAST.2006.313810 (2006)
  6. Patel, M.S., Phillips C.B., Pearce C., Kljakovic M., Dugdale P., et al.: General Practice and Pandemic Influenza: A Framework for Planning and Comparison of Plans in Five Countries. PLoS ONE 3(5): e2269. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002269 (2008)
  7. Kim, J., Deshmukh, A., Hastak, M.: A framework for assessing the resilience of a disaster debris management system. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.028 (2018)
  8. Fan, Chao., Mostafavi, Ali.: Establishing a framework for disaster management system-of-systems. 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon). DOI: 10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369545 (2018)
  9. Mohd, S., Fathi, M. S., Harun, A. N.: Humanitarian Aid Distribution Framework For Natural Disaster Management. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-3/W4, 2018 GeoInformation For Disaster Management (Gi4DM), 18–21 March 2018, Istanbul, Turkey. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-343-2018 (2018)
  10. Cohen, Catherine C., Shang, Jingjing.: Evaluation of Conceptual Framework Applicable to the Study of Isolation Precautions Effectiveness. Journal Advance Nursing 71(10). DOI: 10.1111/jan.12718 (2015)
  11. Depree, Chauncey M.: Testing and Evaluating a Conceptual Framework of Accounting. A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1989.tb00221.x (1989)
  12. Fawcett, J., Desanto-Madeya, S.: Contemporary nursing knowledge: analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis. (2013)
  13. Numi Tran, Quynh-Nhu., Low, Graham.: Comparison of Ten Agent Oriented Methodologies 10.4018/9781591405818.ch012.ch000. (2006).
  14. Siau, K., Rossi, M.: Evaluation of information Modeling Methods - A Reviews. ICSS 1998 Proceedings. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1998.648327 (1998).