Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract. Gerakan Nasional Orang Tua Asuh Scholarship offers a number of scholarship packages. As there are a number of applicants, a system for selection and recommendation is required. we used 3 methods to solve the problem, the methods are AHP for feature selection, SVM for classification from 3 classes to 2 classes, and then TOPSIS give a rank recommendation who is entitled to receive a scholarship from 2 classes. In testing threshold for AHP method the best accuracy 0.01, AHP selected 33 from 50 subcriteria. SVM has highest accuracy in this research is 89.94% with Sequential Training parameter are λ =0.5, constant of γ =0.01 , ε = 0.0001, and C = 1.
Keywords: Selection, Recommendation, Scholarships, AHP-SVM-TOPSIS

Article Details

How to Cite
Putra, M. G. L., Ariyanti, W., & Cholissodin, I. (2016). Selection and Recommendation Scholarships Using AHP-SVM-TOPSIS. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.2016111

References

  1. Foster Parents Movement Foundation Scholarship (GNOTA). (2016, May). “GNOTA | About Usâ€. [Online]. Available: http://gn-ota.or.id/.
  2. S. Mohanty and H. N. Das Bebartta, “Performance Comparison of SVM and K-NN for Oriya Character Recognitionâ€, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, IJACSA, pp. 112-116, 2012.
  3. Y. Yang, Q. Du, and J. Zhao, “The Application of Sites Selection Based on AHP-SVM in 500Kv Substationâ€, Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management, 2010 International Conference on Vol. 2. IEEE, pp. 1225-1229, 2010.
  4. I. Cholissodin, M. Kurniawati, Indriati and I. Arwani, “Classification of Campus E-Complaint Documents Using Directed Acyclic Graph Multi-Class SVM Based on Analytic Hierarchy Processâ€, Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, IEEE, pp. 247-253, 2014.
  5. Yung-Ming Li, Cheng-Yang Lai, Chien-Pang Kao, “Building a qualitative recruitment system via SVM with MCDM approachâ€, Appl Intell, Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2010.
  6. S. Nikou, J. Mezei and H. Bouwman,â€Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Selecting Mobile Service Category (Consumers’ Preferences)â€, International Conference on Mobile Business, IEEE, pp. 119-128, 2011.
  7. K. Shahroodi, K. Amin, S. Amini, and K. S Haghighi, “Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique To Evaluate and Selecting Suppliers in an Effective Supply Chainâ€, Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, Vol. 1, pp. 119-132, 2012.
  8. S. Vijayakumar and Si Wu, “Sequential Support Vector Classifiers and Regressionâ€, Proc.International Conference on Soft Computing, SOCO’99, Genoa, Italy, pp. 610-619, 1999.
  9. C. Cortez and V.Vapnik, “Support Vector-Networkâ€, Machine Learning, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, Netherlands, vol.20, pp. 273-297, 1995.
  10. P. Florent, S. Jorge and X. L. Yan, “Large-Scale Image Categorization with Explicit Data Embeddingâ€, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, pp. 2297-2304, 2010.
  11. L. Auria and R. A. Moro, “Support Vector Machines (SVM) as a Technique for Solvency Analysisâ€, German Institute for Economic Research, Mohrenstr, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  12. D. L. Olson, “Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Modelsâ€, Mathematical and Computing Modelling, Elsevier, Vol. 40, pp. 721-727, 2004.
  13. S. Sembiring, M. Zarlis, D. Hartama, S. Ramliana and E. Walni, “Prediction od Student Academic Performance by an Application of Data Mining Technique†International Conference on Management and Artifical Intelligence, IPEDR, Vol. 6, pp. 110-114, 2011.
  14. J. Thor, S. H. Ding and S. Kamaruddin, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method From the Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspectiveâ€, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, IJES, Vol. 6, pp. 27-34, 2013.
  15. E. Triantaphyllou and S. H Mann,â€Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Application: Some Challengesâ€, International Journal Of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 35-44, 1995.
  16. D. Anguita, A. Ghio, N. Greco, L. Oneto and S. Ridella,â€Model Selection for Support Vector Machines: Advantages and Disadvantages of the Machine Learning Theoryâ€, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN, IEEE, pp. 1-8, 2010.
  17. A. Alinezhad and A. Amini, “Sensitivity Analysis of TOPSIS Technique: The Result of Change in The Weight of One Attribute on The Final Ranking of Alternativesâ€, Optimization in Industrial Engineering, pp. 23-28, 2011.