Selection and Recommendation Scholarships Using AHP-SVM-TOPSIS

Author

M Gilvy Langgawan Putra, Whenty Ariyanti, Imam Cholissodin

Abstract

Abstract. Gerakan Nasional Orang Tua Asuh Scholarship offers a number of scholarship packages. As there are a number of applicants, a system for selection and recommendation is required. we used 3 methods to solve the problem, the methods are AHP for feature selection, SVM for classification from 3 classes to 2 classes, and then TOPSIS give a rank recommendation who is entitled to receive a scholarship from 2 classes. In testing threshold for AHP method the best accuracy 0.01, AHP selected 33 from 50 subcriteria. SVM has highest accuracy in this research is 89.94% with Sequential Training parameter are λ =0.5, constant of γ =0.01 , ε = 0.0001, and C = 1.
Keywords: Selection, Recommendation, Scholarships, AHP-SVM-TOPSIS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Foster Parents Movement Foundation Scholarship (GNOTA). (2016, May). “GNOTA | About Us”. [Online]. Available: http://gn-ota.or.id/.

S. Mohanty and H. N. Das Bebartta, “Performance Comparison of SVM and K-NN for Oriya Character Recognition”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, IJACSA, pp. 112-116, 2012.

Y. Yang, Q. Du, and J. Zhao, “The Application of Sites Selection Based on AHP-SVM in 500Kv Substation”, Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management, 2010 International Conference on Vol. 2. IEEE, pp. 1225-1229, 2010.

I. Cholissodin, M. Kurniawati, Indriati and I. Arwani, “Classification of Campus E-Complaint Documents Using Directed Acyclic Graph Multi-Class SVM Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, IEEE, pp. 247-253, 2014.

Yung-Ming Li, Cheng-Yang Lai, Chien-Pang Kao, “Building a qualitative recruitment system via SVM with MCDM approach”, Appl Intell, Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2010.

S. Nikou, J. Mezei and H. Bouwman,”Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Selecting Mobile Service Category (Consumers’ Preferences)”, International Conference on Mobile Business, IEEE, pp. 119-128, 2011.

K. Shahroodi, K. Amin, S. Amini, and K. S Haghighi, “Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique To Evaluate and Selecting Suppliers in an Effective Supply Chain”, Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, Vol. 1, pp. 119-132, 2012.

S. Vijayakumar and Si Wu, “Sequential Support Vector Classifiers and Regression”, Proc.International Conference on Soft Computing, SOCO’99, Genoa, Italy, pp. 610-619, 1999.

C. Cortez and V.Vapnik, “Support Vector-Network”, Machine Learning, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, Netherlands, vol.20, pp. 273-297, 1995.

P. Florent, S. Jorge and X. L. Yan, “Large-Scale Image Categorization with Explicit Data Embedding”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, pp. 2297-2304, 2010.

L. Auria and R. A. Moro, “Support Vector Machines (SVM) as a Technique for Solvency Analysis”, German Institute for Economic Research, Mohrenstr, Berlin, Germany, 2008.

D. L. Olson, “Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models”, Mathematical and Computing Modelling, Elsevier, Vol. 40, pp. 721-727, 2004.

S. Sembiring, M. Zarlis, D. Hartama, S. Ramliana and E. Walni, “Prediction od Student Academic Performance by an Application of Data Mining Technique” International Conference on Management and Artifical Intelligence, IPEDR, Vol. 6, pp. 110-114, 2011.

J. Thor, S. H. Ding and S. Kamaruddin, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method From the Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspective”, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, IJES, Vol. 6, pp. 27-34, 2013.

E. Triantaphyllou and S. H Mann,”Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Application: Some Challenges”, International Journal Of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 35-44, 1995.

D. Anguita, A. Ghio, N. Greco, L. Oneto and S. Ridella,”Model Selection for Support Vector Machines: Advantages and Disadvantages of the Machine Learning Theory”, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN, IEEE, pp. 1-8, 2010.

A. Alinezhad and A. Amini, “Sensitivity Analysis of TOPSIS Technique: The Result of Change in The Weight of One Attribute on The Final Ranking of Alternatives”, Optimization in Industrial Engineering, pp. 23-28, 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.2016111